Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Birchard v. Citibank
as 2:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
Katie Birchard
Defendant:
Citibank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Hess v. Salt Lake County et al
as 2:2013cv00687
Plaintiff:
Katie Hess
Defendant:
Salt Lake County, James D. Winder, Kevin S. Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Katis v. Chamtech Enterprises
as 2:2013cv00496
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Katis
Defendant:
Chamtech Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ginter v. Harris et al
as 2:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Ginter
Defendant:
Samuel V. Harris, Robert Faust, Richard G. Hamp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lowe et al v. American Medical Systems et al
as 2:2012cv00636
Plaintiff:
Katie A. Lowe and George N. Lowe
Defendant:
American Medical Systems and Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Livingston et al v. York et al
as 2:2011cv00674
Plaintiff:
Dale Livingston and Fred Brunsvik
Defendant:
Louise York, Ted Stewart, Lindsey LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alusa et al v. Salt Lake County, Utah et al
as 2:2011cv00184
Plaintiff:
Liufau Alusa and Katie Alusa
Defendant:
Salt Lake County, Utah, Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office, James M. Winder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Macris et al v. Sevea International et al
as 2:2010cv00962
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Macris and Macris Enterprises
Defendant:
Sevea International, Jerry Saxton , Katie Saxton and others
Counter_claimant:
Jerry Saxton and Katie Saxton
Counter_defendant:
Jerry Saxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garner v. Messersmith et al
as 2:2010cv00354
Plaintiff:
Katie Garner
Defendant:
Katy Messersmith and Shopforbags
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
