Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Bonilla v. Kiefer
as 3:2017cv04587
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Elaine M. Kiefer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Kiefer
as 3:2017cv04135
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Elaine M. Kiefer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiefer et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 5:2017cv00785
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
John William Kiefer, III , Matthew Mitchell , Susan Gonzalez-Pender and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Kiefer v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2017cv00298
Plaintiff:
Wendy Kiefer
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BWP Media USA Inc. et al v. Jack Kiefer et al
as 2:2014cv07374
Defendant:
BABYAGE.COM, INC. and Jack Kiefer
Plaintiff:
BWP Media USA Inc. and National Photo Group, LLC
Kiefer et al v. Bank of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mark F. Kiefer and Daphny M. Kiefer
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, T.D. Service Financial Corporation, Regional Trustee Services Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Kiefer et al v. Bank of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00082
Plaintiff:
Mark F. Kiefer and Daphny M. Kiefer
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, T.D. Service Financial Corporation, Regional Trustee Services Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Michael Cardenas et al v. McLane Foodservice Inc et al
as 8:2010cv00473
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Allnutt, Jose Amaro, Gustavo Andrade and others
Defendant:
DOES, McLane Company Inc and McLane Foodservice Inc
Yu-Sze Yen et al v. Landwin LP et al
as 2:2010cv02398
Plaintiff:
James Adams, Albert & Dawnette Dobrick, Audra & Audrey Knight and others
Defendant:
Jack Andrews, Tom Casault, Sean C Dennison and others
Kiefer v. Hedgepeth
as 3:2009cv02640
Petitioner:
John Kiefer
Respondent:
A. Hedgepeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
