Cases 21 - 30 of 489
Celotto v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Mark S. Celotto
Respondent:
Kathleen Smith, Amira Fox, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DIXON
as 3:2022cv02657
Petitioner:
REGINALD SHERROD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON and MARK S INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Celotto v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv20876
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Celotto
Defendant:
Kathleen Smith, Amira Fox, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Toliver v. The Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
David G. Toliver
Defendant:
The Florida Department of Corrections, Centurion of Florida, LLC, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Petitioner:
Zachary Keith Turner
Respondent:
Mark S. Inch, Department of Corrections and Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TURNER v. INCH et al
as 4:2022cv00012
Petitioner:
ZACHARY KEITH TURNER
Respondent:
MARK S INCH, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
FERGUSON v. INCH et al
as 5:2021cv00239
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN DAVID FERGUSON
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, LESTER FERNANDEZ, SUMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00509
Plaintiff:
BARRY SANDERS
Defendant:
MARK S INCH and ICT BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORRALES v. DIXON et al
as 3:2021cv03422
Plaintiff:
CARLOS R CORRALES
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, SANTA ROSA COUNTY FLORIDA, MARK S INCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
MARK S. TYLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
