Cases 21 - 30 of 41
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.92 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 2.05 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-59-13.01 et al
as 3:2018cv01597
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.92 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 2.05 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-59-13.01, COUNTY OF MERCER, JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.14 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.66 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-78-2 et al
as 3:2018cv01641
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.14 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.66 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-78-2, KASYA, LLC, EDWARD SAN PAOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.12 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.14 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-92-8 et al
as 3:2018cv01631
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.12 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.14 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-92-8, JULIAN F GORELLI, JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.07 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 3.24 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-91-5 et al
as 3:2018cv01666
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 1.07 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 3.24 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-91-5, DEER VALLEY REALTY, INC. and BANK ISLAM (L) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. BRIEHLER et al
as 3:2018cv01588
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
MICHAEL T BRIEHLER, JUDITH A BRIEHLER and PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.36 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 2.39 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-91-34
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 2.14 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 2.35 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-60-4.02 et al
as 3:2018cv01603
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 2.14 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 2.35 ACRES IN HOPEWELL TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1106-60-4.02, COUNTY OF MERCER, JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Robert Jacobsen, et al v. Citi Mortgage Inc, et al
as 17-3267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JACOBSEN and CAROL JACOBSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITI MORTGAGE INC, (NJ), CITI INC, (NJ), CITI MORTGAGE, (NJ) and others
Robert Jacobsen, et al v. Citi Mortgage Inc, et al
as 17-2314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JACOBSEN and CAROL JACOBSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITI MORTGAGE INC, (NJ), CITI INC, (NJ), CITI MORTGAGE, (NJ) and others
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 2.878-ACRES OF LAND IN PRINCETON, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00716
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
2.878-ACRES OF LAND IN PRINCETON, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, JOHN GILBERT WINANT, JR., CATHERINE WINANT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 0.04-ACRES OF LAND IN PRINCETON, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv00739
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
0.04-ACRES OF LAND IN PRINCETON, MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, GENE M. GROSSMAN and JEAN B. GROSSMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
