Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Lupin Limited et al
as 1:2020cv00776
Defendant:
Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Lupin Limited
Plaintiff:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Apotex Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00749
Defendant:
Apotex Corp. and Apotex Inc.
Plaintiff:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01489
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Plaintiff:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Assad v. Arqule Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02383
Defendant:
Argon Merger Sub, Inc., Susan L. Kelley, William G. Messenger and others
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02192
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare Limited, Accord Healthcare, Inc. and Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited
Plaintiff:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Smith v. ArQule, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00001
Defendant:
Argon Merger Sub, Inc., ArQule, Inc., Susan L. Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Smith
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited et al
as 1:2019cv00872
Defendant:
Torrent Pharma Inc. and Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited
Plaintiff:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Witmer v. Immune Design Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00532
Defendant:
David Baltimore, Susan L. Kelley, Lewis Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Witmer
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Sandoz Inc.
as 1:2019cv00312
Defendant:
Sandoz Inc.
Plaintiff:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
