Cases 21 - 30 of 132
CHILDRESS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86290
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, D.B. RILEY, INC., 3M and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN B. CHILDRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86291
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., IMO INDUSTRIES, JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE MAE COOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUPSTID v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86292
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., IMO INDUSTRIES, D.B. RILEY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DUIE LEE CUPSTID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROOSEVELT v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86293
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, EXXON MOBIL CORP., MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CURRY ROOSEVELT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAK v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86294
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., EXXON MOBIL CORP., GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86295
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, 3M, OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ESWIN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOLINGER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86296
Defendant:
VIACOM, INC., D.B. RILEY, INC., MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION, ASTEN-HILL and others
Cross Claimant:
CRANE COMPANY/CRANE VALVE GROUP and CRANE COMPANY/HYDRO-AIRE DIVISION
Plaintiff:
EMILY D. DOLINGER-MILLER and JOHN DOLINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOLLISON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86297
Defendant:
3M, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JUANITA DOLLISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOWDLE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86298
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS DOWDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DYAR v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86299
Defendant:
3M, MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., CRANE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN WAYNE DYAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
