Cases 21 - 30 of 136
CHANEY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01062
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. CHANEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MCGUIRE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00960
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
EDDIE A. MCGUIRE, JR.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LONG v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00961
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
CONNIE L. LONG
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SIMPSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00962
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
AMANDA L. SIMPSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TINDALL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00889
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
SUSAN HAYDEN TINDALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CARTER v. ASTRUE
as 4:2012cv00075
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
LISA L. CARTER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CAMERON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00865
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DON P. CAMERON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
LYONS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00837
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
EILEEN C. LYONS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ZAKUTANSKY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00836
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ALLISON ZAKUTANSKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PRESSER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00835
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
ANDREA PRESSER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
