Cases 21 - 30 of 106
Whitaker v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00207
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Mitchell A. Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Beverage v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00042
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kyle Beverage, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Koonce v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Smelser Koonce
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Saunders v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00157
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sunderland v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00020
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Sunderland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sprinkle v. Astrue et al
as 7:2012cv00085
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
David F. Sprinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Freeman v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00050
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Barry W. Freeman
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Linkenhoker v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00021
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Frank Thomas Linkenhoker, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Greenway v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv00005
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Troy Greenway
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carr v. Astrue
as 7:2011cv00607
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Desiree A. Carr
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
