Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Backcountry Against Dumps, et al v. Abbott, et al
as 2:2010cv00394
Plaintiff:
Backcountry Against Dumps, The Protect Our Communities Foundation, East County Community Action Coalition and others
Defendant:
Jim Abbott, Ren Lohoefener, Bob Abbey and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CO Wild Horse and Burro Coal., et al v. Kent Walter, et al
as 09-5340
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Colorado Wild Horse and Burro Coalition, Inc., American Mustang and Burro Association, Inc., Cloud Foundation, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kent E. Walter, in his official capacity as Field Manager, BLM, Sarah (Sally) E. Wisely, in her official capacity as BLM Colorado State Director, Kenneth Lee Salazar, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Interior and others
The Wilderness Society et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 4:2009cv00096
Plaintiff:
The Wilderness Society, The Wilderness Society, Friends of the Missouri Breaks Monument and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Gene R. Terland, Mike Pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
The Wilderness Society et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 9:2009cv00102
Plaintiff:
The Wilderness Society, Friends of the Missouri Breaks Monument, National Trust for Historic Preservation and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Gene R. Terland, Mike Pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
The Wilderness Society et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 3:2009cv03048
Plaintiff:
The Wilderness Society, BARK, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Ken Salazar, United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Montana Wilderness Association v. Connell et al
as 4:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Montana Wilderness Association , The Wilderness Society , Friends of the Missouri Breaks Monument and others
Defendant:
Gene R. Terland , Mike Pool , Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor:
Recreational Aviation Foundation and Montana Pilots Association
Intervenor_defendant:
Missouri River Stewards , Fergus County , Phillips County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Montana Wilderness Association v. Terland et al
as 9:2009cv00088
Plaintiff:
Montana Wilderness Association and Montana Wilderness Association
Defendant:
Gene R. Terland, Mike Pool, Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Ernest K. Lehmann & Associates, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 09-5148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ernest K. Lehmann & Associates of Montana, Inc. and Mount Royal Joint Venture
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Ned Farquhar, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management, Department of Interior and others
Shasta Resources Council et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2008cv00645
Plaintiff:
Shasta Resources Council, Shasta Coalition for Preservation of Public Land and Sacramento River Preservation Trust
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Dirk Kempthorne, Interior Board of Land Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Friends of the Panamint Valley et al v. Kempthorne et al
as 1:2007cv00487
Plaintiff:
Friends of the Panamint Valley, Friends of the Panamint Valley, Friends of the Panamint Valley and others
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne, Dirk Kempthorne, United States Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant:
National Parks Conservation Association, National Parks Conservation Association, National Parks Conservation Association and others
Amicu:
State Of California People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
