Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kobishop, Jerome v. Marinette County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 3:2013cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jerome W. Kobishop
Defendant:
Marinette County Sheriff's Dept., Mendota Mental Health Center, Mike Haupt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00361
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Pro-Pac Inc v George Chapes III, et al
as 2:2011cv01019
Plaintiff:
Pro-Pac Inc
Defendant:
George Chapes, III
Garnishee:
First National Bank
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00675
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
United Central Bank v. Fourth Street Villas LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00693
Plaintiff:
United Central Bank
Defendant:
Fourth Street Villas LLC, Treyton Oaks LLC, Golf Bridge Apartments I LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The National Bank v. Rockford Bank & Trust Company
as 3:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
The National Bank
Defendant:
Rockford Bank & Trust Company
Counter_claimant:
Rockford Bank & Trust Company
Counter_defendant:
The National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mack, Keith v. The American National Bank of Beaver Dam et al
as 3:2010cv00557
Plaintiff:
Keith Martin Mack
Defendant:
The American National Bank of Beaver Dam, Edward C. Jacobs, Ambanc Financial Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
