Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Rodriguez v. Oklahoma Attorney General
as 5:2014cv00407
Petitioner:
Samuel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Holden v. Addison et al
as 5:2014cv00174
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Holden
Defendant:
Mike Addison and Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Evans et al
as 5:2014cv00063
Petitioner:
Sullivan D Jackson
Respondent:
Edward Evans and Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker v. Martin et al
as 5:2013cv01365
Petitioner:
Alvin Parker
Respondent:
Terry Martin and Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Felmlee v. State of Oklahoma Defendant's et al
as 4:2013cv00803
Petitioner:
Richard Felmlee
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma Defendant's, State of Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, Director of the Attorney Generals Office State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berryhill v. Trammell et al
as 5:2013cv01302
Petitioner:
Lavern Berryhill
Respondent:
Anita Trammell and Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 6:2012cv00242
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Taylor
Respondent:
Oklahoma, State of and Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. Dowling
as 6:2007cv00274
Petitioner:
Wade Allen Edwards
Respondent:
Jim Keith and Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bray v. Oklahoma Attorney General
as 6:2007cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jeromy David Bray
Defendant:
Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wilburn v. Parker, et al
as 6:2007cv00042
Petitioner:
Kenneth Keith Wilburn
Respondent:
David Parker and Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
