Cases filed in New York
Cases 21 - 30 of 221
Whitfield v. Zurn Water Solutions Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv02307
Plaintiff: Matthew Whitfield
Defendant: Zurn Water Solutions Corporation, Todd A. Adams, Mark S. Bartlett and others
Riggs v. Zurn Water Solutions Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv02209
Plaintiff: Rodney Riggs
Defendant: Zurn Water Solutions Corporation, Todd A. Adams, Mark S. Bartlett and others
Keller v. MoneyGram International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02046
Plaintiff: Khristina Keller
Defendant: MoneyGram International, Inc., W. Alexander Holmes, Antonio O. Garza and others
Baker v. MoneyGram International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01971
Plaintiff: Lewis D. Baker
Defendant: MoneyGram International, Inc., W. Alexander Holmes, Antonio O. Garza and others
O'Dell v. MoneyGram International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02721
Plaintiff: Ryan O'Dell
Defendant: MoneyGram International, Inc., W. Alexander Holmes, Amb. Antonio O. Garza and others
Stein v. MoneyGram International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02634
Plaintiff: Shiva Stein
Defendant: MoneyGram International, Inc., W. Alexander Holmes, Amb. Antonio O. Garza and others
Tulin v. MoneyGram International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02638
Plaintiff: Chandler Tulin
Defendant: MoneyGram International, Inc., W. Alexander Holmes, Amb. Antonio O. Garza and others
Sharpstene v. Burcume et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2022cv00027
Plaintiff: Dylan R. Sharpstene
Defendant: Jeffrey Burcume, Natalie Hartle, Peggy Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff: Brian Jones
Defendant: Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Cort L. O'Haver, Peggy Y. Fowler and others
Wilson v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff: Jordan Wilson
Defendant: Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Fowler, Stephen M. Gambee and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?