Cases 21 - 29 of 29
PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES PC v. ORIJI
as 1:2017mc00209
Plaintiff:
PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES PC
Defendant:
UGOCHI ORIJI
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
SMITH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv00443
Plaintiff:
ROSALIE L. SMITH
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, MICHAEL SAUDINO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
BOYKIN et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2016cv05543
Plaintiff:
VERA BOYKIN, ROSALIE L. SMITH, JACQUELINE WILSON and others
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Denise Otto v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, et al
as 16-3385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENISE OTTO
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC, US BANK NA, as Trustee for BNC Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-2 and others
David Schraven, et al v. Phelan Hallinan Diamond & Jone, et al
as 16-1255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SCHRAVEN and KELLY SCHRAVEN, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated former and current homeowners in Pennsylvania
Defendant - Appellee:
PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES PC and US BANK NA, as trustee for J.P. Morgan Mortgage acquisition trust 2006-CH2, asset backed passed through certificates, series 2006-CH2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00221
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv07239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
