Cases 21 - 30 of 232
Fowler v. People of California
as 3:2023cv01819
Petitioner:
Douglas Edward Fowler
Respondent:
People of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Parker v. The People of California
as 1:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Parker
Defendant:
The People of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Dunigan v. Raybon Johnson, et al
as 22-56152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYBON C. JOHNSON, Warden, CSPA LA COUNTY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Hart v. People of California
as 4:2022cv07346
Petitioner:
Stephen S. Hart
Respondent:
People of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Juarez v. 39 Million People of California
as 3:2022cv06621
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Juarez
Defendant:
39 Million People of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Mayorga v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2022cv01940
Petitioner:
Mario Michael Mayorga
Respondent:
People of California State of California and Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guerrero v. People of California
as 5:2022cv06088
Petitioner:
James Guerrero
Respondent:
People of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Dunigan v. Raybon C. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv07216
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dunigan v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
