Cases 21 - 30 of 56
ACOSTA v. MOSLUOGLU, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04663
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
IHSAN GUNAYDIN, ENGIN GUNAYDIN and MOSLUOGLU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Samaritan Caregivers, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02036
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Samaritan Caregivers, LLC and Sone E. Ekukole
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
ACOSTA v. FORMICA DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04452
Defendant:
STEVEN FORMICA, FORMICA DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING, INC., MICHAEL FORMICA and others
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Shalimar Distributors et al
as 4:2018cv01642
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
TAFS Corporation, Shalimar Distributors and Mohammad Tahir
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
ACOSTA v. SPREAD BAGELRY LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04307
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
LARRY ROSENBLUM, DIDIANE ARNUTI, SPREAD BAGELRY PENN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. SMCHOI, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03855
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
SMCHOI, INC. and STEVE CHOI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. DANNY'S PIZZA ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01047
Defendant:
DANIEL ROWSICK and DANNY'S PIZZA ENTERPRISES, INC.
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. SCHWAB et al
as 5:2018cv03544
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
JODI SCHWAB, SCHWAB CONTRACTING, INC. SIMPLE IRA PLAN, ADAM SCHWAB and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ACOSTA v. WATER TRANSFER SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00885
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
WATER TRANSFER SOLUTIONS, LLC and JOSEPH DUGAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. PIZZA FOR LIFE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00656
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
PIZZA FOR LIFE, INC. , HARDON PIZZA, INC. , PIZZA IS BELIEVING, INC, and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
