Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Williams v. Cheatham et al
as 1:2014cv22088
Plaintiff:
Caleb Glenn Williams
Defendant:
R. C. Cheatham and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simmons v. Cheatham et al
as 1:2014cv21794
Plaintiff:
Kenneth O. Simmons, Jr.
Defendant:
R. C. Cheatham and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marrero-Cruz v. R C Cheetham et al
as 1:2014cv20432
Plaintiff:
Omar Marrero-Cruz
Defendant:
R C Cheetham and FCI Miami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reed v. R C Cheatham
as 1:2014cv20416
Plaintiff:
Willie Bud Reed, Jr.
Defendant:
R C Cheatham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Camejo v. R C Construction & Investments, Inc.
as 1:2014cv20182
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ceballos Camejo
Defendant:
R C Construction & Investments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Knox v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00022
Petitioner:
R. C. Knox
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. WALLACE SPRINKLER & SUPPLY INC, et al
as 3:2013cv00631
Plaintiff:
SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
WALLACE SPRINKLER & SUPPLY INC, MORETTE COMPANY INC, LITTLE SABINE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv10068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Holt v. Perry et al
as 3:2012cv00559
Plaintiff:
Maressa M. Holt, E. H., Jr., R. C. and others
Defendant:
Tyler Perry, Wackenhut Security Corporation, Elrod and Elrod Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mastrangelo v. R C C Associates, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv60476
Plaintiff:
John Mastrangelo
Defendant:
R C C Associates, Inc. , Richard Rhodes and Beverly Raphael
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
