Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b Agency Decision - Right to Counsel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv01688
Plaintiff:
VIKRAN JEET SINGH, DAMANPREET KAUR and NO PARTY
Defendant:
UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SINGH et al v. JADDOU et al
as 1:2022cv01689
Plaintiff:
VIKRAM JEET SINGH and DAMANPREET KAUR
Defendant:
UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
