Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2014cv02530
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark Luttrell, Jr., James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Todd et al
as 3:2014cv01335
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
James D. Todd, Shelby County Government and Director of U.S. Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Benson v. Mark Luttrell, Jr., et al
as 14-5750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON, aka Rickey Benson
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., Mayor, JAMES E. COLEMAN, JR., Director, TONYA BEASLEY, Grievance Supervisor and others
Ricky Benson v. Shelby County Government, et al
as 14-5626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., JAMES E. COLEMAN and others
Ricky Benson v. TN, et al
as 14-5551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al., OFC. LUCILLE MOORE, G. REDDICK, Sergeant and others
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2014cv02314
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Benson v. TN
as 14-5350
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON, aka Rickey Benson
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Ricky Benson v. TN, et al
as 13-6652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al.
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2013cv02989
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark H. Luttrell, Jr, James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Benson v. Patricia Echols, et al
as 13-6598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON, aka Rickey Benson
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA ECHOLS, THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE S.C.D.O. C.. MEDICAL UNIT, PENINAH BOTWINICK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
