Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Lollis et al v. Fransein et al
as 4:2015cv00589
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
Doris Fransein, Rodney Sparkman and Wilma Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. Department of Human Resources et al
as 4:2015cv00593
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
Department of Human Resources, Rodney Sparkman, Wilma Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. Felty et al
as 4:2015cv00585
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
Kyle Felty, Brandy O'Brian, Brandy Laird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. Department of Human Resources et al
as 4:2015cv00587
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
Department of Human Resources, Sharron Kay Wells, Rodney Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. O'Brian et al
as 4:2015cv00596
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
Brandy O'Brian, Brandy Laird, Kyle Felty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2015cv00591
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
Rodney Sparkman, Wilma Palmer and Doris Fransein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arguello Hope & Associates PLLC v. Penn Grand Limited et al
as 5:2015cv00998
Plaintiff:
Arguello Hope & Associates PLLC
Defendant:
Penn Grand Limited , W Ray Pelfrey and Rosemarie Pelfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lollis et al vs. Fransein
as 4:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Fred C Lollis and Rosemary A Lollis
Defendant:
Doris Lewis Fransein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al vs. Lake, et al
as 4:2015cv00351
Plaintiff:
Fred Lollis and Rosemary Lollis
Defendant:
Edward Lake, Sharron Wells, Dewey Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lollis et al v. Motel 6
as 4:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Fred C Lollis and Rosemary A Lollis
Defendant:
Motel 6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
