Cases 21 - 30 of 30
William Jackson v. Warden, et al
as 13-14028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM R. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, DEXTER MOSES, Lieutenant, Rutledge State Prison, MELVIN NORWOOD, Lieutenant, Rutledge State Prison and others
Gay v. J. T. Rutledge State Prison et al
as 1:2013cv02679
Plaintiff:
Sammy Levi Gay
Defendant:
J. T. Rutledge State Prison, Georgia Department of Corrections and Washington
Middleton v. Washington et al
as 1:2013cv00423
Petitioner:
Christopher T. Middleton
Respondent:
Anthony Washington, Rutledge State Prison and Georgia Department of Corrections
William Jackson v. State of Georgia, et al
as 12-16018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM R. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON and others
Jackson v. WASHINGTON, et al
as 4:2012cv00235
Plaintiff:
William R. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Rutledge State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. McIntyre et al
as 2:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Marcia McIntyre, Sharin Caskin, A. Toby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Ozburn et al
as 3:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lamont Daniels
Defendant:
Samuel D Ozburn, W Kendall Wayne, Buddy Nix, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truitt v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2008cv00056
Plaintiff:
Frederick Truitt
Defendant:
Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hicks v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2007cv00919
Plaintiff:
Wayne Hicks
Defendant:
Warden, J.T. Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bingham v. Rutledge State Prison
as 1:2007cv00440
Plaintiff:
Randall Bingham
Defendant:
Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
