Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Beasley v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 4:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
William Nolan Beasley, Sr
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs and Randy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Huntsman v. State of Idaho
as 1:2015cv00057
Petitioner:
Ronald John Huntsman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00103
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158
Papse v. Little
as 1:2014cv00046
Petitioner:
Livingston J Papse, Sr
Respondent:
Little
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2013cv00182
Plaintiff:
Patrick A White, Sr
Defendant:
State of Texas, American Correctional Assoc, Jose F Barderas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans et al v. Shoshone-Bannock Land Use Policy Commission et al
as 4:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
David M. Evans , Sage Builders and Ron Pickens
Defendant:
Shoshone-Bannock Land Use Policy Commission, Nathan Small, Glenn Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Gonzales
as 1:2012cv00056
Defendant:
Marcelino Muri Gonzales, Sr
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Brakke v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00455
Plaintiff:
Randolph E Brakke, Sr
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections , ISCI, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
William Gray
Defendant:
Michael Johnson, Kim Spaulding, Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP et al
as 1:2010cv00404
Plaintiff:
Donna Taylor and Dale Miesen
Defendant:
Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP, Gary Babbitt, Richard Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
