Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Cooks v. 7AM-3PM Shift Correctional Officers for Div. 11 tier AB et al
as 1:2020cv04026
Defendant:
Tom J. Dart, Manicipality of the City of Chicago "Manel Claim", Superintendant of Division 11 and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Cooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Warner et al
as 1:2019cv05530
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Sargent Thomas, Carla Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Quinton Cortez Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. County of Will et al
as 1:2019cv04244
Plaintiff:
Simon A. Lee
Defendant:
County of Will, Mike Kelly, Unknown Named Sheriff Police and Sheriff Deputies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peck v. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv03571
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Peck
Defendant:
Sargent Baker, Tom Dart and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv04071
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Lieutenant Scheland, Nurse Rhonda and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F. Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Johns et al
as 1:2018cv07838
Defendant:
Correctional/Officer Johns, Warden Nieholson, Correctional/Officer Anishich and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Maurice Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Sargent
as 1:2018cv07565
Defendant:
Darryl Sargent
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sargent v. Lashbrook
as 1:2018cv06597
Petitioner:
William Eugene Sargent
Respondent:
Jacqueline Lashbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv02641
Plaintiff:
Arronis Jackson
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Cook County Sheriffs, Superintedent - RTU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv08847
Plaintiff:
Nelon Drake
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Ofc. Kalina, Sargent Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
