Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Silas-Wesley v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv07406
Defendant:
State of Illinois, County Of Cook and United States of America
Plaintiff:
King Silas-Wesley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Pita et al v. Sila Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04897
Plaintiff:
Jesus Pita , Amilcar Hernandez and Noe Montoya
Defendant:
Sila Maintenance, Inc. and Benio Infelise, individually
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sila Management, Inc. et al v. Hyper Microsystems Incorporated et al
as 1:2012cv02207
Plaintiff:
Sila Management, Inc. and Felix Shalit
Defendant:
Hyper Microsystems Incorporated and Gregory Yurovsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00307
Plaintiff:
Silas Walker
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Silas-Williams v. Brown
as 1:2011cv07368
Plaintiff:
Monique Silas-Williams
Defendant:
Judge Micheal Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597 et al v. T.V.S. Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05964
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597 , Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Welfare Fund, Local 597 , Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Training Fund, Local 597 and others
Defendant:
T.V.S. Mechanical, Inc. and Silas Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Armour v. Country Club Hills et al
as 1:2011cv05029
Defendant:
Country Club Hills, John Silas and Guiveda Francois
Plaintiff:
Abeid Armour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp et al v. Silas et al
as 1:2011cv02768
Plaintiff:
Leonard Sharp and Royce Bennett
Defendant:
John Silas, Giles and City of Country Club Hills, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez v. Sila Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00815
Defendant:
Sila Maintenance, Inc. and Benio Infelise
Plaintiff:
Raul Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
