Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Bowell v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00397
Plaintiff:
James E. Bowell
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, High Desert State Prison, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Geier v. Wong et al
as 3:2010cv00493
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Geier
Respondent:
K. Wong, L. Jang, W. Kushner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randall v. Kimura, et al
as 2:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Jerald Randall
Defendant:
T. Kimura, D. Swingle, J Nepomuceno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Cummings et al
as 3:2009cv01912
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hill
Defendant:
Cummings, C Cook, D Torza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Falltrick et al
as 1:2009cv01251
Plaintiff:
Walter W. Boyd
Defendant:
D. Falltrick, R. Roberson and T. Kimura-Yip
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Falltrick et al
as 2:2009cv02039
Plaintiff:
Walter W. Boyd
Defendant:
D. Falltrick, R. Roberson and T. Kimura-Yip
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coats v. Kimura et al
as 2:2009cv01830
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Coats
Defendant:
T. Kimura and T. - Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Enenmoh et al
as 1:2008cv01849
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Foster
Defendant:
A. Enenmoh, T. Cates, Ken Clark and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baptiste v. Dunn et al
as 2:2008cv01420
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Baptiste
Defendant:
G. Dunn, C. Hopson, D. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wafer v. Suesberry et al
as 1:2007cv00865
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Wafer
Defendant:
W. Suesberry, Yamaguchi, Greenough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
