Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Jones v. Clark
as 1:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
Mark Jones
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Clark
as 2:2022cv02080
Petitioner:
Mark Jones
Respondent:
Tiffanie Clark
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Clark
as 1:2022cv01861
Petitioner:
Keith Griffin
Respondent:
Tiffanie Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huckabee v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01084
Plaintiff:
John Huckabee
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark, Tracey Bordner, Shawn M Thrush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullum v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Detrick Cullum
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark, Cherryle Hinthorne, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Carlos Padilla, III
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark, Jennifer Meaker, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Jefferies et al
as 1:2022cv01010
Plaintiff:
Vibron Lloyd
Defendant:
Rob Jefferies, Tiffany Clark and Wexford Health Sources Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Bowton et al
as 1:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Roy Reese
Defendant:
Joshua Bowton, Clay Dobson, Natalie Bealteu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chester v. Bybee et al
as 1:2021cv01368
Plaintiff:
Darryl Chester
Defendant:
Derrick Bybee, . Joachim, . Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Osmundson et al
as 1:2021cv01345
Plaintiff:
Shaquan Carter
Defendant:
Kurt Osmundson, Dwayne Bernard, Graham Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
