Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Diane Chorosevic, et al v. MetLife Choices, et al
as 09-1880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Diane Chorosevic and Lawrence Chorosevic, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
MetLife Choices, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, United Healthcare Insurance Company and others
American Surgical Assistants Inc v. United HealthCare of Texas
as 4:2009cv00774
Plaintiff:
American Surgical Assistants Inc
Defendant:
United HealthCare of Texas and United Healthcare Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. ACN Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00810
Plaintiff:
Arlen Smith
Defendant:
ACN Group, Inc., ACN Group, Inc., United HealthCare of Texas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
The Greater Houston Neurosurgery Center vs United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 4:2008cv02643
Defendant:
United Healthcare of Texas, Inc. and United Healthcare Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
The Greater Houston Neurosurgery Center, P.A. and The Greater Houston Neurosurgery Center, P.A.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Memorial Hermann Hospital System v. United HealthCare et al
as 4:2008cv00392
Plaintiff:
Memorial Hermann Hospital System
Defendant:
United HealthCare and United HealthCare of Texas
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Thousand Oaks Clinic v. United HealthCare of Texas, Inc.
as 5:2007cv00541
Plaintiff:
Thousand Oaks Clinic
Defendant:
United HealthCare of Texas, Inc. and United HealthCare of Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Memorial Hermann Hospital System v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 4:2007cv01092
Plaintiff:
Memorial Hermann Hospital System and Memorial Hermann Hospital System
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company, United Healthcare Insurance Company, United Healthcare of Texas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
