Cases 21 - 30 of 140
Rothenberg v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Aaron Rothenberg
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DAVIS v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
as 3:2022cv21526
Plaintiff:
ARIANNA DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAVIS v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 3:2022cv21524
Plaintiff:
ARIANNA DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mathews v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01801
Plaintiff:
Adrian Mathews
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McDade v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2022cv21241
Plaintiff:
Ronald McDade
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. doing business as UPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
