Cases filed in California
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
SPPI-Somersville, Inc. et al v. TRC Companies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2004cv02648
Defendant: City of Antioch, United States Air Force, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff: SPPI-Somersville, Inc., Somersville-Gentry Inc. and West Coast Home Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
West Coast Home Builders, Inc. v. Aventis Cropscience USA Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2004cv02225
Defendant: E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, General Motors Corporation, USX Corporation and others
Plaintiff: West Coast Home Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CA Dept Toxic Sub v. Brighton Oil Co, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2002cv00018
Plaintiff: California Department of Toxic Substances Control
Defendant: Brighton Oil Co, Brighton-Bengal Oil Refining Co., Herbert S McDuffie, Jr and others
Counter_claimant: R L Niello Inc , Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Tiechert Inc and others
Counter_defendant: California Department of Toxic Substances Control , Aerojet General Corp , Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Cross_claimant: Gordon Turner Motors Inc , Aerojet General Corp , Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant: Herbert S McDuffie, Jr , Christine E McDuffee , Charles V. Kester and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Sacramento County and Aerojet General Corp
Thirdparty_defendant: Union Oil Company of California , Atlantic Richfield , Exxon Mobil Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
USA, et al v. Shell Oil Co, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1991cv00589
Defendant: Atlantic Richfield Company, Los Coyotes Estates Ltd, McAuley LCX Corporation and others
Plaintiff: State of California Department of Health Services Hazardous Substances Cleanup Fund and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
City of Pomona et al v. Chevron USA Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00529
Plaintiff: City of Pomona, City of Pomona, City of Pomona and others
Defendant: Chevron USA Inc., Chevron Corporation, Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
California Department of Toxic Substances Control State of et al v. Archer Daniels Midland Company et al
as 2:2007cv07966
Plaintiff: California Department of Toxic Substances Control State of, California Department of Toxic Substances Control State of, The California Toxic Substances Control Account and others
Defendant: Archer Daniels Midland Company, Atlantic Oil Company, Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Reports
United States of America v. AC Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv06881
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: AC Products, Inc., A.G. Layne, Inc., AdvancePCS Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Union Oil Company of California et al v. California Air Resources Board
as 2:2007mc00094
Plaintiff: Union Oil Company of California and UNOCAL Corporation
Defendant: California Air Resources Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Union Oil Company of California et al v. California Air Resources Board
as 2:2007at00898
Plaintiff: Union Oil Company of California and UNOCAL Corporation
Defendant: California Air Resources Board
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Atlantic Richfield, et al v. Unocal Corp, et al
as 2:1995cv02379
Plaintiff: Shell Oil Products Company, Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc, Chevron USA Inc and others
Defendant: Unocal Corp and Union Oil Company of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?