Cases 21 - 30 of 70
HENDERSON et al v. EMORY UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2018mc00152
Defendant:
EMORY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, RONNIE JOWERS, PETER BARNES and others
Petitioner:
VANGUARD GROUP, INC. and THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
CONNIE CORPENING, HUBERTA W WALLER, CYNTHIA T. JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
BELL v. ATH HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
as 2:2018mc00148
Defendant:
ATH HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
Plaintiff:
MARY BELL
Petitioner:
THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
MICRO FOCUS (US), INC. et al v. VANGUARD GROUP, INC.
as 2:2018cv01862
Plaintiff:
MICRO FOCUS (US), INC. and MICRO FOCUS IP DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
Defendant:
VANGUARD GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
SMITH v. THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01842
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SMITH
Defendant:
THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC. and VANGUARD FIDUCIARY TRUST COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
BROCK v. THE VANGUARD GROUP
as 2:2016cv06281
Plaintiff:
A. KAREN BROCK
Defendant:
THE VANGUARD GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAKSIR et al v. THE VANGUARD GROUP
as 2:2016cv05713
Plaintiff:
ALEX TAKSIR and ORIT TAKSIR
Defendant:
THE VANGUARD GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTATE OF RICHARD G. LUTZ, JR. et al v. LUTZ et al
as 2:2016cv01461
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF RICHARD G. LUTZ, JR. and SHEREE NORDALL
Defendant:
SANDRA LUTZ, MOTORIST LIFE INSURANCE CO. , STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DANON v. VANGUARD GROUP, INC.
as 2:2015cv06864
Plaintiff:
DAVID DANON
Defendant:
VANGUARD GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
