Cases 21 - 30 of 87
PETTIS v. BONDS et al
as 3:2018cv11626
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Petitioner:
JASON PETTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUDY v. JOHN DOE et al
as 1:2018cv10387
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHN RUDY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, N.J. D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EBERT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv09826
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. EBERT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, WILLIE BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFER v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2018cv09590
Plaintiff:
BRIAN COFER
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, WILLIE BONDS, SERGEANT JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOULD v. BONDS et al
as 1:2018cv09406
Petitioner:
CHARLES W. GOULD
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CRAFT v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv08620
Petitioner:
NATHAN CRAFT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANKO v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2018cv05725
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SANKO
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, ST. FRANCES HOSPITAL, WILLIE BOND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALADINO v. BONDS et al
as 2:2018cv03199
Petitioner:
BRIAN J. PALADINO
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS, GARY M. LANIGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PAULINO v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv02690
Petitioner:
ANTONIO PAULINO
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CALDWELL v. SHEEHAN et al
as 1:2018cv01258
Plaintiff:
ODERI CALDWELL
Defendant:
DANA SHEEHAN, AL SOLANIK, LUZ TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
