Cases 21 - 30 of 4,450
(PC) Spengler v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01573
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Spengler Jr.
Defendant:
CDCR, Warden, Internal Revenue Service, Fresno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene William Hillman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01175
Petitioner:
Eugene William Hillman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derrick Lamar Hairston v. Warden
as 2:2024cv04855
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael R. Spengler v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv04759
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler, Jr.
Defendant:
CDCR, Does 1-10, Officers of B Yard Building 1, Does 1-10, Medical Administration and Doctor of Control of B Yard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatchett v. Clark
as 4:2024cv03246
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Warden Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Tessmer v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01500
Petitioner:
Robert Henry Tessmer Jr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Mejia et al
as 3:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Ryan M. Marshall
Defendant:
L. Mejia and The Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Standley v. Pfeiffer
as 3:2024cv03081
Petitioner:
Curtis R Standley
Respondent:
Warden Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gomez v. Andes
as 3:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
John B. Gomez
Respondent:
Warden Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jared Lincoln Fitzgerald v. Warden Lammer
as 5:2024cv01066
Petitioner:
Jared Lincoln Fitzgerald
Respondent:
Warden Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
