Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Craycraft v. Warden, Hocking Correctional Institution
as 1:2013cv00089
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Craycraft
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Grenoble v. Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility
as 2:2013mc00001
Petitioner:
Dean Grenoble
Respondent:
Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility
Stepler v. Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2012cv01209
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Stepler
Defendant:
Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility, Lucas Curry, Alice Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 2:2012cv01146
Petitioner:
David L Harvey
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Romulus Nedea v. Warden Hocking Correctional Fa
as 12-4439
Movant:
In re: ROMULUS NEDEA
Respondent:
WARDEN HOCKING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Acre v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 3:2012cv02562
Petitioner:
Daniel Acre
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acre v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 2:2012cv00939
Petitioner:
Daniel Acre
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nedea v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 2:2012cv00821
Petitioner:
Romulus Louis Nedea
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kulyk v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 2:2012cv00643
Petitioner:
John W. Kulyk
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lenzzie Vance v. Warden, Hocking Correctional F
as 12-3211
Petitioner - Appellant:
LENZZIE R. VANCE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, HOCKING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
