Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Francis Grandinetti, II v. Wes Mun, et al
as 17-16635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Defendant - Appellee:
WES MUN, HCD Administrator, et al., for agency DPS-Hawaii (Department of Public Safety), for said State, all HCD/DPS medical staff, doctors, P.A.'s, R.N.'s, MHW's, nurses, professional service providers, and all contractors, et al., LOUIS KEALOHA, Police Chief, Honolulu Police Department for State, DPS and others
Grandinetti v. Mun et al
as 1:2017cv00215
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Defendant:
Wes Mun, Louis Kealoha, DPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abraham v. Espinda
as 1:2016cv00656
Plaintiff:
Verece Abraham
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata, Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grandinetti v. Humane Restraint Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00456
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Defendant:
Humane Restraint Company, Inc., National Contractor, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Victory Ohana Does et al
as 1:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Victory Ohana Does, Lyle Antonio, HCF MISHU Floorboy DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grandinetti v. Inverness Medical Company et al
as 1:2012cv00489
Plaintiff:
Francis A. Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Inverness Medical Company, All agents, collectors, employers or IMC representative, and healthcare providers involved, Supervisory Governmental requestors or local regulators over Inverness Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Alden v. H. C. F. Administrator et al
as 1:2008cv00196
Plaintiff:
Pauline Alden
Defendant:
H. C. F. Administrator, Kay Bauman and Wes Mun
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
