Cases 21 - 30 of 94
Pittman v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2010cv00629
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
Attorney General, V Aguirrie and Robert Hernandez, .
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Sanchez
as 3:2010cv00625
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
Sanchez, -
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. The Attorney General et al
as 3:2010cv00628
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
The Attorney General, Robert Hernandez, . and Tome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Sandor
as 3:2010cv00623
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
Gary Sandor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Jone et al
as 3:2010cv00613
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
Jone, H L Anderson, H L Howzrder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Sandor et al
as 3:2010cv00617
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
Gary Sandor , A Sanchez and Robert Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Sandor et al
as 3:2010cv00622
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
Gary Sandor , Perez and Riverside County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Sandor et al
as 3:2010cv00619
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
G Sandor , D Pearson , Warden's Correction Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Pearson et al
as 3:2010cv00615
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
D Pearson, A Jefferson, J Kita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Sandor et al
as 3:2010cv00616
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
Gary Sandor , A Sanchez and Robert Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
