Cases 21 - 30 of 113
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
RISENHOOVER v. SHUI-BIAN et al
as 1:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Defendant:
CHEN SHUI-BIAN, STEPHEN YOUNG, CLIFFORD HART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHEN v. ICS PROTECTIVE SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
SHUGUANG CHEN
Defendant:
ICS PROTECTIVE SERVICES, KEITH MOYLER and DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
O'DIAH v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2023cv00653
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, JOHN G. ROBERTS and others
Plaintiff:
AROR-ARK ARK O'DIAH
Claimant:
SYNCHRONY BANK and PARK & NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
OLULO LLC v. YAN et al
as 1:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
OLULO LLC
Defendant:
CHEN YAN and LOLO SURGICAL LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
