Cases 21 - 30 of 155
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sinex v. Quagliano et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Donald Sinex
Defendant:
Jeanne M. Quagliano and Steven D. Quagliano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gibbs v. J&D Wolff's, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00216
Plaintiff:
Spencer Gibbs
Defendant:
J&D Wolff's, Inc. doing business as Family Fun Amusements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson National Life Insurance Company v. Bent et al
as 2:2021cv00165
Defendant:
Diane Bent, M.B. and Estate of Wayne D. Bent
Plaintiff:
Jackson National Life Insurance Company
Not Yet Classified:
Shannon Bertrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivan v. Sanders et al
as 2:2021cv00095
Defendant:
D M Hart, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosson v. Donovan et al
as 5:2021cv00088
Defendant:
Phil Scott, Devil, T.J. Donovan and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Crosson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Crosson v. Windham County Probate Court et al
as 5:2021cv00089
Defendant:
Windham County Probate Court, T.J. Donovan, Raymond Massucco and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Crosson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosson v. Vermont Department of Children and Family Services et al
as 5:2021cv00090
Defendant:
Phil Scott, Devil, Commissioner of Adult Protectives and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Crosson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosson v. Town of Bellows Falls et al
as 5:2021cv00091
Defendant:
Town of Bellows Falls, State Reps, Raymond Massucco and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Crosson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosson v. Dionne
as 5:2021cv00092
Defendant:
Adam Dionne
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Crosson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
