Cases 21 - 30 of 663
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pinales-Garcia v. United States
as 1:2023cv02005
Plaintiff:
Luis Alonso Pinales-Garcia
Defendant:
Timothy W. McDonald and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as - Fed. Question - Assault, Libel, Slander
Doro-on v. Saffen
as 1:2023cv02038
Plaintiff:
Anna Doro-on
Defendant:
Franklin R. Saffen
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as - Fed. Question - Assault, Libel, Slander
Swender v. Lamfers et al
as 5:2023cv04073
Plaintiff:
Herbert J. Swender
Defendant:
Jean Lamfers and Sarah Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Velayo v. Fox, et al
as 23-3139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN D. VELAYO
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL FOX and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd. v. Crocs, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01790
Plaintiff:
Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd.
Defendant:
Crocs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Unfair Competition (Lanham Act)
Quinn v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2023cv02335
Plaintiff:
Andrew Quinn
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
M.H. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01735
Plaintiff:
M.H.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Does 1 Through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Martinez v. Shannon et al
as 1:2023cv01471
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Martinez
Defendant:
Gabriel Shannon and Wendy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Saxena v. Allen
as 23-1212
Counter Defendant:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Counter Claimant:
JEFFERY THOMAS ALLEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
