Cases 21 - 30 of 44,585
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kevas Ballance
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. Seeley et al
as 3:2024cv03098
Plaintiff:
Jose Reyes
Defendant:
Jason Seeley, Marc Hergott and Mundelein Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dahl
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Cermak Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv03446
Plaintiff:
Charles Nelson
Defendant:
Cermak Hospital, Cook County Jail and Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huerta v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03452
Plaintiff:
Jose V. Huerta
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2024cv50161
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Warden Gonzales, Andre Matevousian, Timothy Moisant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor, Jr. v. Sgt. et al
as 3:2024cv50162
Plaintiff:
Narcellus Juwan Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt., Eric T., D. Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01170
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tuck v. Condreva et al
as 1:2024cv03425
Plaintiff:
William Tuck
Defendant:
Condreva, Lammert and Starling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
