Cases 21 - 30 of 2,292
Mitch Taebel v. Taylor Swift
as 2:2024cv02669
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Taylor Swift
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Tashae Davis
Defendant:
Tiffany Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assualt,Slander
Brianna Beauty LLC. v. Stanko
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Brianna Beauty LLC.
Defendant:
Brian Stanko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
David Brown et al v. Chadwick Darnell et al
as 2:2024cv02614
Defendant:
CHADWICK DARNELL, CHAD DARNELL, MANDRA PICTURES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Brown, DB Film LLC, FHC FUND 1 LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Truology LLC v. Stanko
as 2:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Truology LLC
Defendant:
Brian Stanko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Motekaitis et al v. USI Insurance Services National, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Paul Motekaitis and Carri Mangelli Kneass
Defendant:
USI Insurance Services National, Inc., James D. Kane and Karen Mondshine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
M.G. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01727
Plaintiff:
M.G.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
A.M. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01732
Plaintiff:
A.M.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Qualman v. Thorne
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Treg Qualman
Defendant:
Jodi L. Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Rice v. Cherry
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Abigail Rice
Defendant:
Joselyn Cherry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
