Cases 21 - 30 of 3,847
Richardson v. Menard Inc
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joyce A Richardson
Defendant:
Menard Inc doing business as Menards
Other:
Galen Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
COVINGTON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
RONALD COVINGTON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kitchen v. Robert Bosch LLC
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
William Kitchen
Defendant:
Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
K.A. v. SHRIIJI, INC. d/b/a QUALITY INN & SUITES
as 1:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
K.A., an individual
Defendant:
SHRIIJI, INC., dba QUALITY INN & SUITES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BOOKER-STANCIEL v. WALMART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
CARLA BOOKER-STANCIEL
Defendant:
WALMART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reed et al v. Walmart Inc
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Vickie Reed and Don Reed
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Tanner v. Indiana Beach Holdings LLC
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Tanner
Defendant:
Indiana Beach Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
McCoy v. Horseshoe Hammond, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Tywanna McCoy
Defendant:
Horseshoe Hammond, LLC, Kathryn Jenkins and Horseshoe Hammond, LLC doing business as Horseshoe Casino Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Clauss v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Saymara Clauss
Defendant:
Walmart Inc and Walmart, Inc.
Other:
Dan Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Yager v. Menard, Inc
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Randy Yager
Defendant:
Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
