Cases 21 - 30 of 2,283
Chew v. Graphite Bio, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Glen Chew
Defendant:
Graphite Bio, Inc., Perry Karsen, Abe Bassan and others
Stephens v. Maplebear Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Andy Dean Stephens
Defendant:
Maplebear Inc. d/b/a Instacart, Fidji Simo, Nick Giovanni and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Ader v. NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01759
Plaintiff:
Ali Ader
Defendant:
NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., William J. Rieflin, David V. Goeddel and others
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Alexander Tai
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
Boren v. Kinnate Biopharma Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Morgan Boren
Defendant:
Kinnate Biopharma Inc., Dean J. Mitchell, Nima Farzan and others
Rossi v. DeChellis et al
as 3:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
Stephen Rossi
Defendant:
Anthony DeChellis, Cooper Christopher and Morgan Stanley & Co LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Glazing Employers and Glaziers Union Local #27 Pension and Retirement Fund v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Glazing Employers and Glaziers Union Local #27 Pension and Retirement Fund
Defendant:
iRhythm Technologies, Inc., Quentin Blackford, Brice Bobzien and others
Ward v. Coinbase, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Marc R Ward
Defendant:
Coinbase, Inc., Brian Armstrong and Gary Gensler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kim v. Eargo, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Sang Hyun Michael Kim
Defendant:
Eargo, Inc., Donald Spence, Katie J. Bayne and others
DeKalb County Pension Fund v. Roblox Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv06618
Plaintiff:
DeKalb County Pension Fund
Defendant:
Roblox Corporation, David Baszucki, Michael Guthrie and others
Petitioner:
Jarett Taylor, Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and Ye Ming
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
