Cases 21 - 30 of 14,919
Romero v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11157
Plaintiff:
Jessica Romero
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cole v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11159
Plaintiff:
Steve Wesley Cole
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moczynski v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11143
Plaintiff:
Gerald W. Moczynski
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ballis v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11145
Plaintiff:
William Ballis
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robin v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11146
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robin
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mahan v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11147
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Mahan
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Winn et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2024cv10504
Plaintiff:
Aimee Winn and Cory Winn
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kirby v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11114
Plaintiff:
David Kirby
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watkins v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11115
Plaintiff:
Dennis Watkins
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marchuk et al v. Long
as 1:2024cv11129
Plaintiff:
Anastasiia Marchuk, Yipeng Wang, Weiguo Wang and others
Defendant:
Jinping Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
