Cases 21 - 30 of 438,633
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Duchnowski et al v. LaRusso et al
as 2:2024cv03433
Plaintiff:
Leo Duchnowski
Defendant:
Anthony LaRusso, Dr. Donna Henig, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ornauer v. MITRA QSR KNE, LLC d/b/a MITRA QSR
as 2:2024cv03443
Plaintiff:
SaraJo Ornauer
Defendant:
MITRA QSR KNE, LLC d/b/a MITRA QSR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carnales et al v. 3302 Junko Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03420
Plaintiff:
Felipe Carnales and Javier Santillan
Defendant:
3302 Junko Restaurant Inc. doing business as Junko Sushi and Changjin Zheng
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Tercuman v. Gamma Realty LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03430
Plaintiff:
Ahmet Tercuman
Defendant:
Gamma Realty LLC, Casol Realty LLC, New York Heights LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Youssef v. Minos Diner, Inc. d/b/a Woodrow Diner et al
as 1:2024cv03439
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Youssef
Defendant:
Minos Diner, Inc. d/b/a Woodrow Diner and Magdy Kheir
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
