Cases 21 - 30 of 14,087
KENON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
CARLOS S KENON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CASEY v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M CASEY
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAZILL v. COTTON et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BRAZILL
Defendant:
COTTON, VIRGINIA LOCKEY and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY v. GEO GROUP
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEREZ V SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00178
Petitioner:
Julio A. Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KIRKLAND v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY M KIRKLAND
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FREDERICK v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
JOHN HENRY FREDERICK, SR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and LIBERTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE et al
as 3:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
ROY WAYNE JACKSON, JR
Defendant:
UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE, CMC PHARMACY and UNIVERSITY TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
G ENGLISH and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
