Cases 21 - 30 of 10,365
LEE v. ODOM
as 5:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
ROOSEVELT LEE, JR
Respondent:
ROY ODOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
KYRIMA ANDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MADDOX v. MIMS et al
as 5:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL LAMAR MADDOX
Defendant:
CHARLES MIMS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILCOX v. WALTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
ANTAVIUS TEAZIA WILCOX
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY JAIL and CORRECT HEALTH MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and SGT TELUR ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. BUTTS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
JORDAN WATSON
Respondent:
BUTTS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, THOMAS H WILSON, MICHAEL PARISH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
