Social Security Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,634
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by filed date
Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv30016
Plaintiff: Marta Ortiz
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv10533
Plaintiff: Jeanne Taylor
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10417
Plaintiff: Jamile C Smith
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mercado v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10423
Plaintiff: Leslie Mercado
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nahhas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv10041
Plaintiff: Iman I. Nahhas
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Duran v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10263
Plaintiff: Miguelina Duran
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Boyle v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10198
Plaintiff: Renee Lorraine Boyle
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rochester v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv10210
Plaintiff: James Henry Rochester
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tambolleo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv10347
Plaintiff: Jason Steven Tambolleo
Defendant: Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Arrington v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv10371
Plaintiff: Michael D. Arrington
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?