Cases 31 - 40 of 242
Newman v. Department of Services for Children
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Shantell Newman
Defendant:
Department of Services for Children
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. State of Delaware Division of Public Health
as 1:2021cv01546
Plaintiff:
Shantell Newman
Defendant:
State of Delaware Division of Public Health
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CGFNS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGATION SERVICES
as 2:2021cv04529
Plaintiff:
CGFNS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CHOWNS FABRICATION & RIGGING INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
as 5:2021cv04283
Plaintiff:
CHOWNS FABRICATION & RIGGING INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
as 2:2021cv04217
Plaintiff:
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PALMER BIEZUP & HENDERSON LLP v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 2:2021cv02225
Plaintiff:
PALMER BIEZUP & HENDERSON LLP
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
YIM v. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
as 3:2021cv07031
Plaintiff:
JIN-PYONG PETER YIM
Defendant:
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MARTINO v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2021cv01342
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS KYLE MARTINO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LASHERAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv00580
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOHN CRAVO LASHERAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Hoffmann v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 2:2020cv06427
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Hoffmann
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
