Cases 31 - 40 of 227,328
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
OLUWADAMILARE v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06201
Petitioner:
ADELKE B. OLUWADAMILARE
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLAGER v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 2:2024cv06209
Petitioner:
TIWAN FLAGER
Respondent:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RODGERS v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv06202
Plaintiff:
EVAN RODGERS
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, EUGENE CALDWELL, II, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EMISSIVE ENERGY CORPORATION v. OLIGHT STORE USA, INC.
as 8:2024cv06214
Plaintiff:
EMISSIVE ENERGY CORPORATION
Defendant:
OLIGHT STORE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ESPERION THERAPEUTICS, INC. v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06224
Plaintiff:
ESPERION THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Defendant:
ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC. and INTAS PHARMACEUTICALS, LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv06221
Plaintiff:
JUANA J. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
v. KOLENOVIC et al
as 1:2024cv06212
Defendant:
DJULIA KOLENOVIC and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CALERDON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06217
Plaintiff:
DAVID CALERDON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
KOLENOVIC v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv06213
Plaintiff:
DJULIA KOLENOVIC
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
