Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv02324
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Kinnard-Owen et al v. Scarborough, et al.
as 2:2015cv02447
Plaintiff:
Eva Kinnard-Owen and Tavion Kinnard
Defendant:
Jacqueline Scarborough, Affirmative Insurance Company and RPM Pizza LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. RPM Pizza Inc
as 3:2015cv00403
Defendant:
ABC Insurance Company and RPM Pizza Inc
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ann Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill v. Johnnys Pizza House Inc
as 3:2015cv01062
Plaintiff:
Donald Hill
Defendant:
Johnnys Pizza House Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Husband v. RPM Pizza, LLC
as 2:2014cv02149
Plaintiff:
Richard Husband
Defendant:
RPM Pizza LLC and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chevalier v. R P M Pizza L L C
as 6:2014cv02682
Plaintiff:
Marvin Chevalier
Defendant:
R P M Pizza L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnnys Pizza House Inc et al v. Rotolos L L C
as 3:2014cv00982
Plaintiff:
Johnnys Pizza House Inc and J P H Franchising Inc
Defendant:
Rotolos L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
RPM Pizza, LLC v. Fidelity Communications Corporation
as 3:2013cv00737
Defendant:
Fidelity Communications Corporation
Plaintiff:
RPM Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Humble Lodging LLC et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05385
Plaintiff:
Humble Lodging LLC , Om Sri Ganeshaya Namah LLC , Fire Stone Business Corporation and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc. , BP America Production Company , BP p.l.c. and others
Petitioner:
Hockley Investment LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
