Cases 31 - 40 of 312
Wyatt v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00740
Petitioner:
Carl Dean Wyatt, Jr
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00726
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Payne v. Seventh Judicial District Court, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
as 5:2022cv00631
Petitioner:
Jamie Lynn Payne
Respondent:
Seventh Judicial District Court, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Defendant:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Crow
as 6:2022cv00218
Petitioner:
Leslie Kevin Johnson
Respondent:
D.C. Cole and Scott D. Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bridges v. Gates et al
as 4:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Kris Edward Bridges, II
Defendant:
Kevin Gates, White Boy, Billy Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tahchawwickah v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00585
Petitioner:
Christopher Tahchawwickah
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollan v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00313
Petitioner:
Marion Dale Hollan
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v Crow
as 4:2022cv00334
Defendant:
David George Clark and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Tulsa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00279
Petitioner:
Shiron D Davis
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
